Skip to main content


Thinking again of Jane Grey, a royal of Tudor times, and how the world was robbed of her brilliance when she was beheaded on orders of Queen Mary, when Jane was only seventeen. Most people focus on the history around her short time wearing the crown of England (the first woman, or girl, to do so in her own right), but to me her life before is much more fascinating.

The writings of her tutor and of philosophers in Europe, where you can feel how much in awe they were of her intellect while knowing she was a fifteen year old girl, are spine tingling. Her translating a book into ancient Greek from another ancient language and giving it to her father as his birthday present, at that same age, indicates she was indeed super smart but also a total show-off.

in reply to Gidi Kroon

This tutor taught a class of three. All royal kids, all super smart, all went on the become historically significant. I think of them as the Harry Potter trio. One was the King of England, son of Henry VIII, who was placed on the throne at a really young age and the nobles ruled for him, but before his teenage years he already started to take control back. The other girl would become Queen Elizabeth I and we all know she was a powerful force. But this tutor couldn't stop singing the praises of Jane, a minor royal, who outshone them all.
in reply to Gidi Kroon

There's this story where this tutor came to visit Jane and her family (again around her age of 15), only to find the family had gone out for a hunt (bad thing, but that's what they did in those days). But only the father, mother and the two other daughters had gone out, Jane was still in the house, so the servants let him in to the main room. There he found her reading a book, sitting in the window to catch enough light. He asked why she was still inside and hadn't gone with her family and enjoy the pleasures of the hunt. She replied, with complete earnest surprise, that she didn't understand why they had gone outside while instead they could be sitting here in the window enjoying the pleasures of reading Plato in the original Greek.

If there's anything that defines a character...

in reply to Gidi Kroon

Why so many stories of her at that young age? She died at seventeen, this is all there is.
in reply to Gidi Kroon

British people tend to call her Lady Jane Grey, to emphasise they aren't calling her Queen Jane. Because Mary had to declare Jane's time as Queen illegitimate and everything else follows from there, suggesting Jane was Queen calls into doubt the current person on the British throne and is therefore treason. I'm not British so I don't have that problem. To me she's Queen Jane.
in reply to Gidi Kroon

in reply to Gidi Kroon

During her months in The Tower, Mary sent her own chaplain, the most learned Catholic in the country, to Jane every single day to try and convert her. Every day he reported back to Mary that he had not succeeded in converting Jane to Catholicism. His private writings in his journals have been preserved. In it he says that not only did he not succeed in converting her, but many days Jane almost succeeded in converting him.

She could argue like the best. And she would never give in.

(She was aware that the deal was that if she converted to Catholicism, she would be let out and not executed. It says quite something that she didn't take that deal.)

in reply to Gidi Kroon

In those days science wasn't some people together doing experiments, but it was a network all over Europe of individual people, usually old gray men, at home thinking about stuff and writing their thoughts down in letters to each other. What blows my mind is that 15 year old Jane Grey was part of that network. Not by trickery, writing under her father's name, or them only replying out of politeness. No, they fully knew who she was and they accepted her as an equal. It's a shame her letters have not been preserved.

What could she have achieved had she been able to live into adulthood. I believe she would have become an important scientist whose name we'd remember. Can you imagine that an earlier scientist even than Isaac Newton would have been a woman, rather than us having to wait centuries later for Marie Curie? I think our whole perception of gender in science would be different.