Skip to main content


Each time it was mentioned that covid was becoming endemic I didn't understand why this was supposed to be a good thing. Accepting that the virus kept circulating surely meant accepting that people kept dying? Turns out I'm not the one who was misunderstanding it. A quote from nature:


"There is a widespread, rosy misconception that viruses evolve over time to become more benign. This is not the case: there is no predestined evolutionary outcome for a virus to become more benign, especially ones, such as SARS-CoV-2, in which most transmission happens before the virus causes severe disease."
-- Aris Katzourakis


h/t Alice Roberts

COVID-19: endemic doesn’t mean harmless

in reply to Gidi Kroon

I recently heard another quote about endemicity that changed my perspective on it. It goes something like this:

"People think that COVID being endemic means we can stop thinking about it, when really it just means we have to think about it all the time."

Agreed it's not a good outcome, but it was probably inevitable.

in reply to Paul

@Paul That's another good point. The article doesn't consider endemicity inevitable, though.
@Paul