The Voyager 1 space probe was launched from Cape Canaveral #OTD in 1977, a few weeks after Voyager 2.
Now it's the most distant human-made object – about 14.96 billion miles from Earth, racing away from us at 38,000 miles per hour with respect to the Sun.
Images: NASA/KSC/JPL
Gidi Kroon likes this.
reshared this
Robert McNees
in reply to Robert McNees • • •Voyager 1’s outbound trajectory took it by Jupiter in 1979, then past Saturn the next year.
This time lapse of the Jupiter approach consists of 66 frames, take once per Jovian day. Look carefully for moons darting past, shadows flickering across the face of the planet.
Credit: NASA/JPL
Robert McNees
in reply to Robert McNees • • •Voyager 1 discovered three new moons (Prometheus, Pandora, and Atlas) shepherding Saturn's A- and F-rings.
It also uncovered a wealth of new information about basic properties of Saturn's moon Titan, from size to atmospheric composition.
Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech
Robert McNees
in reply to Robert McNees • • •The trajectory that gave Voyager 1 the best view of Titan (a mission priority) sent it out of the ecliptic and towards interstellar space.
Ten years later, in 1990, Carl Sagan suggested that the probe should point its camera back at the solar system for a family portrait.
The sixty frame mosaic captured by Voyager 1 on Valentine's Day of 1990 shows Jupiter, Earth, Venus, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.
voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/galleries…
Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech
Voyager - Solar System Portrait
voyager.jpl.nasa.govRobert McNees
in reply to Robert McNees • • •The frame containing Earth shows a dramatic optical artifact because we are near the Sun in the camera's field of view.
That's the Pale Blue Dot. Suspended in a sunbeam, captured from a distance of 40 AU by a probe out on the edge of darkness.
After that, mission scientists turned off Voyager 1's cameras to save power.
Image: NASA/JPL
Robert McNees
in reply to Robert McNees • • •By 1998, Voyager 1 was at 68 AU, further out than Pioneer 10.
Around 2004, at about 94 AU from the Sun, it crossed the termination shock and entered the heliosheath.
And in 2012, at 121 AU from the Sun, Voyager 1 crossed the heliopause and entered interstellar space.
Robert McNees
in reply to Robert McNees • • •But Voyager 1 hasn't left the solar system. At 161 AU, its current distance from the Sun is a fraction of Sedna's 936 AU aphelion (though it is currently further out than the minor planet).
And it's nowhere near the inner edge of the Oort cloud, thousands of AU from the sun.
This chart shows Voyager 1's location in 2013, with distance from the sun plotted on a log scale. It is at roughly the same place today, since the next step on the scale jumps from 100 to 1000 AU.
Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech
Gidi Kroon likes this.
Robert McNees
in reply to Robert McNees • • •So even though Voyager 1 has a long way to go, I wouldn't fault anyone for describing it as being at "the edge of the solar system."
It’s the fastest and most distant thing humans have ever made, it’s okay to sound a little dramatic.
Astro Migration reshared this.
Robert McNees
in reply to Robert McNees • • •When we receive data from Voyager 1, we’re picking up a signal sent about 22 hours and 19 minutes ago.
Of all the objects humans have hurled into space, Voyager 1 is the closest to being one full light-day away from us.
The speed of light is 3 x 10⁸ m/s, and Voyager 1 is traveling at about 38,000 mph with respect to the Sun. A few conversions turns that into about 0.5 light-hours per year. So we're a little over three years away from Voyager 1 being one full light-day away from us.
Robert McNees
in reply to Robert McNees • • •Six of the probe’s scientific instruments have been powered down. The other four will be shut off over the next few years. When it reaches a distance of one light-day we’ll still be able to communicate with it, but it won't have much to say.
Voyager 1 will remain in range of our Deep Space Network for some time after that. Eventually, though, it won't be able to muster enough power for a detectable signal, and will quietly sail off into darkness.
voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/downloads…
Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech
Voyager - Downloads
voyager.jpl.nasa.govAstro Migration reshared this.
CitizenFortress, BScIT
in reply to Robert McNees • • •Christopher Kyba
in reply to CitizenFortress, BScIT • • •CitizenFortress, BScIT
in reply to Christopher Kyba • • •Victor
in reply to Robert McNees • • •Amanda Grace
in reply to Robert McNees • • •Mark T. Tomczak
in reply to Robert McNees • • •Lando
in reply to Mark T. Tomczak • • •W6KME
in reply to Robert McNees • • •andrybak
in reply to Robert McNees • • •Jill duh
in reply to Robert McNees • • •Edelruth For HARRIS-WALZ 2024
in reply to Robert McNees • • •mklovenotcyber
in reply to Robert McNees • • •PetrichorLove
in reply to Robert McNees • • •xs4me2
in reply to Robert McNees • • •We do not deserve this pale blue dot…
Anna Nicholson
in reply to Robert McNees • • •How do astronomers arrive at the length of a day for a gas giant?
There are various bands of fluid rotating in different directions in the time-lapse video
Given the relatively static nature of the Great Red Spot in Voyager 1’s photographs, I’m guessing that the rotational period of this well-known feature is (or was at the time) used as the rotational period of the planet as a whole, i.e. the length of a Jovian day
Or is the composition of Jupiter sufficiently well understood that it’s possible to calculate the moment of inertia of the planet about its rotational axis?
Robert McNees
in reply to Anna Nicholson • • •@transponderings They're all rotating the same way. The appearance of rotating in different directions is a result of capturing frames at fixed intervals while they move at slightly different speeds.
There's not too much variation in the speeds, though. Depending on whether you use polar or equatorial bands, the day varies by about 5 or 10 minutes. Another definition (used by IAU) is rotational period of the planet’s magnetosphere.
GJ Groothedde 🇪🇺
in reply to Robert McNees • • •Andrea Casalotti
in reply to Robert McNees • • •bouriquet
in reply to Robert McNees • • •Jennifer Wojcik
in reply to Robert McNees • • •CosmicBlaze
in reply to Robert McNees • • •