Skip to main content


#AI is going to kill us, but not in the typical scifi way: robots with laserguns or control over nuclear bombs

That's too flashy. It will be far more mundane

It's going to kill us via the firehose of falsehood

The tricky part:

The problem is not making people believe lies

The problem is making us so cynical, we disbelieve truth

In a world where nothing is trusted as true, and only bias remains, this will lead us down familiar societal paths of mob "truth" over real trusted evidence

1/x

#ai
This entry was edited (9 months ago)
in reply to ⏩︎VOTE⏪︎ ᶜʸⁿⁱᶜⁱˢᵐ⁼ᵃᶜᶜᵉᵖᵗᵃⁿᶜᵉ (Ben Royce)

Look at this picture

What do you see?

Context:

The picture blew up on social media because it depicts police outside the Louvre, which experienced a spectacular theft of Napoleonic jewels, which seems like a detail right out of Hercule Poirot or Arsène Lupin or Sherlock Holmes... and so... et voila... the frisson of this picture is remarkable

Is the picture real? Or is it #AI?

2/x

#ai
This entry was edited (9 months ago)
in reply to ⏩︎VOTE⏪︎ ᶜʸⁿⁱᶜⁱˢᵐ⁼ᵃᶜᶜᵉᵖᵗᵃⁿᶜᵉ (Ben Royce)

When I saw that picture on AP by photographer Thibault Camus (who photographed several other people who were pushed outside), I knew, it was real because of the renowned *source*. (Therefore I never boost posts without clear sources.)
In this case, it was easy to find the source with inverse photo search.

The problem here was not that guy photographed by accident, it was the fake stories full of clichés about him coming up in social media. france24.com/en/france/2025102… 1/2

This entry was edited (9 months ago)
in reply to Petra van Cronenburg

Really interesting. That guy with the umbrella could easily looked as if comped into the shot. :)
in reply to Carolyn

Assuming it's fake is much easier than accepting the harsh reality that people in Paris are just better dressed and better looking than the rest of us.
in reply to ⏩︎VOTE⏪︎ ᶜʸⁿⁱᶜⁱˢᵐ⁼ᵃᶜᶜᵉᵖᵗᵃⁿᶜᵉ (Ben Royce)

Now here is the problem

Because #AI fakes have trained you about "too good to be true" scenes, you immediately distrust the picture above

*That* is the problem

Where before a picture was a picture, now, for everyone, there is the bias of distrust. We, buried in cynicism now, distrust first, and discard evidence *on the bias of 'too good to be true'*

Here is another picture from the same scene by the same photographer (Thibault Camus, a photographer for The Associated Press):

3/x

#ai
This entry was edited (9 months ago)
in reply to ⏩︎VOTE⏪︎ ᶜʸⁿⁱᶜⁱˢᵐ⁼ᵃᶜᶜᵉᵖᵗᵃⁿᶜᵉ (Ben Royce)

"someone else altered it"

"the lighting is too perfect"

"it's not #AI it's photoshop"

etc

maybe the picture is real?

🤷

To be honest, I don't care

The picture is a prop for my point here:

*It's not about whether or not the picture is real or fake, it's about how we distrust everything now*

Pointless insipid endless arguments about real v fake... what is that replacing?

On far more important issues in the world

And that can be manipulated

Meta-deception

Deception, about deception

4/x

#ai
This entry was edited (9 months ago)
in reply to ⏩︎VOTE⏪︎ ᶜʸⁿⁱᶜⁱˢᵐ⁼ᵃᶜᶜᵉᵖᵗᵃⁿᶜᵉ (Ben Royce)

There's many multiple layers here

A picture, concerning a heist with deception... if that picture's a deception. Based on a preconception about fictional masters of deception. And the implications of it all about how we are becoming victims of #AI deception. Or, more deeply- how our biases about being deceived by lies, deceives us from seeing the truth: boomeranging self-deception

🫨 🫨 🫨

😵‍💫 🥴 😵

5/5

#ai
This entry was edited (9 months ago)
in reply to ⏩︎VOTE⏪︎ ᶜʸⁿⁱᶜⁱˢᵐ⁼ᵃᶜᶜᵉᵖᵗᵃⁿᶜᵉ (Ben Royce)

@Ben Royce 🏳️‍⚧️ 🇺🇦 🇸🇩 I've seen this picture in Instagram captioned with "This is the detective in charge of the Louvre heist". My partner showed it to me and I said "This doesn't look too unlikely for someone in Paris to be dressed like this but it is unlikely this would be the detective. After looking at the comment of the post, bingo, nothing to do with the police but the picture seems authentic.

Not everybody has someone who's lived a few years in Paris to debunk such a blatant piece of misinformation to gather likes on a commercial social platform though.

in reply to Hypolite Petovan

@hypolite

and, correct me if i'm wrong, but these are people leaving the museum, which was closed when this picture was taken?

so i would guess, as if i were a detective, that this is an employee

if you work in an art museum, dapper historical dress does not seem at all out of line with your profession

in reply to Magical Cat

@koteisaev
I've seen so many far right people say essentially this: "everyone is just going on faith, so it's okay for me to believe what I want"

It's like they're disowning objective reality, because it might get in the way of their self-contradicting fantasies.

in reply to FediThing :progress_pride:

@FediThing
May be this is a "mental self-defence" trick, like "whoa the thing I believe so hard is a piece of bullshit infinitely far from facts?! Then let it be worse for facts! There is no facts!!!111" then [screeching] and all these Netflix-level special effects.
And it was exploited by Surkov's "post-modernism vulgaris" & kremlin Goebelses 2.0
in reply to Grumble 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 🇬🇱

@grumble209 @koteisaev
That's a really good way of putting it.

Perhaps the people most in touch with reality are those with the least amount of privilege 😞

This might explain a lot of problems in society.